WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] jump_label: if a key has already been

To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] jump_label: if a key has already been initialized, don't nop it out
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 18:08:34 -0400
Cc: Linux, Jan, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>, David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx>, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jason Baron <jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx>, Glauber <jang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, rth@xxxxxxxxxx, Michael Ellerman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen Devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 15:09:35 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4E8E2025.30004@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <cover.1317506051.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx> <477dead9647029012f93c651f2892ed0e86b89e7.1317506051.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx> <20111003150205.GB2462@xxxxxxxxxx> <4E89E28C.7010700@xxxxxxxx> <20111004141011.GA2520@xxxxxxxxxx> <4E8B3489.60902@xxxxxxxxx> <4E8CF348.4080405@xxxxxxxx> <4E8CF385.2080804@xxxxxxxxx> <4E8DEB19.1050509@xxxxxxxx> <20111006181055.GA2505@xxxxxxxxxx> <4E8DEFDE.4030706@xxxxxxxxx> <4E8E2025.30004@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 14:39 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:

> I'm not sure it would be a win, necessarily.  My test with back-to-back
> jmp2 was definitely slower than with the nop padding it out to 5 bytes;
> I suspect that's a result of having too many jmps within one cacheline. 
> Of course, there's no reason why the CPU would optimise for jumps to
> jumps, so perhaps its just hitting a "stupid programmer" path.

Just a note. Micro-benchmarks are known to be as good as political polls
and statistics. They show a much different view of the world than what
is really there.

-- Steve



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>