Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 10 of 23] libxl: separate forced and non-forced device remove

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Campbell writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH 10 of 23] libxl: separate forced and 
non-forced device remove"):
> libxl: separate forced and non-forced device remove.
...
>   * the term "destroy" is normally used in libxl for data-type destructors.

I've always thought this was odd.  Perhaps we should rename all of
those "free" and then we could use "destroy" just for domain
destruction and other kinds of violent activity.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel