WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl (fwd) [and 1 more mess

To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl (fwd) [and 1 more messages]
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:13:35 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>, Sven Köhler <sven.koehler@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:14:10 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1109091307080.12963@kaball-desktop>, <1315577875.3180.67.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <j4ar95$8fi$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110908170755.GB16730@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <j4bgsc$ka$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1109091226250.12963@kaball-desktop> <4E69F80A.5060905@xxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1109091254590.12963@kaball-desktop> <4E6A09F2.4040405@xxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1109091353470.12963@kaball-desktop> <1315577875.3180.67.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1109091307080.12963@kaball-desktop>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl 
(fwd)"):
> I think I have found the issue: if blktap2 is not enabled xl is going to
> start qemu (to provide a disk backend) even if it is not actually needed
> because the user wants to use blkback.
> 
> We have a patch upstream to fix this issue but it hasn't been backported
> to 4.1:

Thanks, I have applied it to 4.1.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>