WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Testing nested virtualization on Intel CPUs

To: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Testing nested virtualization on Intel CPUs
From: AP <apxeng@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 22:18:56 -0700
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Eddie Dong <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 22:20:04 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Kma9LbzrlIkLfObzsoC+c8Yq8zDrecfhT2RaN1tabdQ=; b=m/uOYAoOnrHxs0FA8xbdlWipwO/FS8MwAUWSZ4DeEdDV1bSyeC95VDU/pIz1uJmR39 WysUeGUubzOqKAKelGHdbwRkezKtJf2lw8HXeUZvyhJ/snb3tb1r8ew2x3RaCw8H4X88 4/wta4mdHhKI9Z1jJ36g/H/uRgXkOYD7rzS0Y=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20110920175712.GB35343@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAGU+autjPnjevraC5vhX4RAMC2XrqkfKUN_ZuJz1r0r3078=0Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110920175712.GB35343@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


On Sep 20, 2011 10:57 AM, "Tim Deegan" <tim@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Cc'ing Eddie Dong, who wrote this code.
>
> At 18:16 -0700 on 16 Sep (1316196980), AP wrote:
> > I am testing out nested virtualization on a Lenovo x220 (Intel
> > i7-2620M). I am running xen-unstable (23842:483c5f8319ad) and Linux
> > 3.0 (Ubuntu 10.10).
> > I brought up a Centos 5.6 VM and installed Xen that is packaged with
> > it. I think it is a variant of 3.0. The CentOS Xen VM boots very
> > slowly but it does finally come up in to the nested Dom0.
>
> Yes, booting Xen as a nested guest is very slow at startup, because of
> how Xen relocates the bottom 1MB at boot time.  You might find that
> 32-bit Xen boots faster.
>

Could please expand a little on why the relocation causes it to slow down?

Thanks,
AP

> In general I expect performance of a nested-HVM guest on Intel to be
> quite poor, because it doesn't yet have nested EPT support.  Eddie, is
> that something you're working on?
>
> Tim.
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel