|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with the	tip tr
 
| 
To:  | 
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Subject:  | 
[Xen-devel] Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen tree with the	tip tree | 
 
| 
From:  | 
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Date:  | 
Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:48:24 +1000 | 
 
| 
Cc:  | 
Xen Devel <Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-next@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Delivery-date:  | 
Tue, 13 Sep 2011 17:49:12 -0700 | 
 
| 
Envelope-to:  | 
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
In-reply-to:  | 
<20110914103234.4f2f6a2dd65734de6622e79f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
List-help:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> | 
 
| 
List-id:  | 
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-post:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-subscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> | 
 
| 
List-unsubscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> | 
 
| 
References:  | 
<20110825142450.c84e02d8763cfd1a93411844@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	<4E5690C3.2050706@xxxxxxxx> <4E5693DD.2010307@xxxxxxxxx>	<20110826090619.7588d424798f53a6f3621eb2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	<4E56D6E1.6030405@xxxxxxxxx>	<20110826125441.709aa423cdf072ce085fb91c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	<20110913211154.fe53ca8c1d608def77a69022@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	<alpine.LFD.2.02.1109131706410.2723@ionos>	<4E6FC2D3.2060408@xxxxxxxx>	<20110914103234.4f2f6a2dd65734de6622e79f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Sender:  | 
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
 
 
Hi all,
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:32:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:
>
> My understanding is this:  I do *not* need to revert the spinlock changes
> from tip anymore, correct?
Right, having looked at the tip tree, they are not in there any more.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
 
 
pgpfHaV22rBn3.pgp 
Description: PGP signature 
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |