|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Stability report GPLPV 0.11.0.308
 
Hello James,
 I am doing quite rigorous torture tests with Xen and GPLPV. Let me first 
repeat the test setup:
Use Xen 4.1.1 and kernel 2.6.32.36 (commit ae333e9).
 Configure 2 HVMs called VM1 and VM2 as follows (per HVM): 2 VCPUs, 2 
virtual disks, 1024 MB RAM, viridian=1
Install Windows 2008 R2 SP1, do install everything twice - never clone. 
Install GPLPV, iometer 2006.07.27, prime95 26.6 x64, ActiveState Perl 
5.12.4 x64, wget for Windows and the attached perl script.
 Run iometer with 2 workers on the same but separate second virtual disk, 
queue depth 4 per worker, access specification "All in one".
Run prime95 torture test with "In-place large FFTs". On VM1 use the task 
manager to set affinity to VCPU2, on VM2 set affinity to VCPU1.
Run the perl script to fetch a good mix of some large (50-500 MB) and 
many small (some KB) files from a high performance FTP server on the LAN 
(I use vsftpd).
This generates quite some load as vmstat shows:
virt5620 ~ # vmstat 1
 procs -----------memory---------- ---swap-- -----io---- -system-- 
----cpu----
 r  b   swpd   free   buff  cache   si   so    bi    bo   in   cs us sy 
id wa
 0  0      0 723408   6860  33860    0    0 82113 82132 22503 30252  2 
12 84  0
 0  0      0 723408   6860  33860    0    0 80117 82913 23109 30776  1 
13 83  0
 4  0      0 723408   6860  33860    0    0 92555 87013 28411 33283  2 
12 84  0
 4  0      0 723408   6860  33860    0    0 82678 85775 26228 31739  1 
13 83  0
 5  0      0 723408   6860  33860    0    0 82252 84837 24180 29723  1 
14 82  0
 With GPLPV 0.11.0.308 it worked perfectly and with very good performance 
for over 9 days but then when I wanted to monitor the status, I was no 
longer able to connect via remote desktop. When examining the file 
system of the HVMs I found that somehow even the prime95 processes did stop.
 Any ideas? Could c/s 948 make any difference? Network worked perfectly 
for 9 days, so I ask myself if the count of c/s 948 is used at all?
Regards Andreas
 
 
test-via-wget.pl 
Description: Text document 
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-devel] Stability report GPLPV 0.11.0.308,
Andreas Kinzler <=
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |