xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: expose MWAIT to dom0
On 15/08/2011 09:14, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> cpu_has() accesses a pre-filled capabilities bitmask, filled from cpuid,
>> right? And cpuid goes through a pv_ops hook?
>>
>
> I'm not quite catching you here. Do you want to prefill mwait bit from pv_ops
> hook unconditionally even in current situation where Xen doesn't expose
> mwait, or selectively under some dom0's boot option even when Xen is
> changed to expose mwait? The first case is not sane, while for the 2nd case
> I don't think any pv_ops hook is required as long as Xen can expose it, isn't
> it?
But there is a pv_ops hook, and Xen isn't going to expose it because it
breaks old dom0 kernels.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] expose MWAIT to dom0, Tian, Kevin
- [Xen-devel] Re: expose MWAIT to dom0, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: expose MWAIT to dom0, Tian, Kevin
- [Xen-devel] Re: expose MWAIT to dom0, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: expose MWAIT to dom0, Tian, Kevin
- [Xen-devel] Re: expose MWAIT to dom0, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: expose MWAIT to dom0, Tian, Kevin
- [Xen-devel] RE: expose MWAIT to dom0, Jan Beulich
- [Xen-devel] Re: expose MWAIT to dom0,
Keir Fraser <=
- [Xen-devel] RE: expose MWAIT to dom0, Tian, Kevin
- [Xen-devel] Re: expose MWAIT to dom0, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] RE: expose MWAIT to dom0, Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: expose MWAIT to dom0, Tian, Kevin
Re: [Xen-devel] expose MWAIT to dom0, Jan Beulich
|
|
|