|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] xen-unstable warn_on in msi.c:636
>>> On 30.06.11 at 15:31, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>> On 30.06.11 at 14:03, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Olaf / Jan / all, what do you think of the attached patch, which
>>> teaches the MSI code how to deal with 0 pbas?
>>
>> No, definitely not an option. They simply must not be zero. The
>> problem just is that the BARs for virtual functions all read as zero
>> (and the real value must be calculated from information from the
>> PF's config space).
>
> But at the moment it IS zero, and this "real value" is simply not
> being calculated.
>
> I realize this needs to be fixed the Right Way eventually, but at the
> moment anyone who uses SRIOV will have a bunch of scary warnings which
> they can't do anything about except ignore; and it's never a good idea
> to condition people to ignore this kind of warning.
>
> If the current situation is safe enough that fixing it is a low
> priority, then it's safe enough to remove the warnings for the time
> being. If it's not safe enough to remove the warnings, then it's not
> safe enough to leave and a fix needs to be a priority.
Attached a patch that eliminates the warnings for me (tested on a single
system only so far). It ought to apply cleanly to current tip of -unstable.
Jan
x86-msi-vf-bars.patch
Description: Text document
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- Re: [Xen-devel] xen-unstable warn_on in msi.c:636,
Jan Beulich <=
|
|
|
|
|