xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Attempt to backport changeset-23088, changeset-23089
On 28/07/2011 22:50, "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Is that 23089:8ec7808f9c23 and 23088:49728fe8dd6a? There is zero chance of
>> either of those being the cause of a build failure under tools/firmware
>
> It was 23089:0300d7f10d42 and 23088:37ba0319e2cf from
> http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/staging/xen-4.1-testing.hg/.
Ah okay, well neither of those would break the tools/fimrware build either.
> Build was on Ubuntu
> 11.10 . There was notice
> of Ian Campbell regarding Ubuntu's patching ipxe on xen-4.1.0/debian/patches
> . He wrote that it was worth to look into that. I will try to find his
> message.
Yes, it seems more likely to be an Ubuntu patch that has broken your build.
-- Keir
> Boris.
>
>
> --- On Thu, 7/28/11, Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Attempt to backport changeset-23088,
>> changeset-23089 to Xen 4.1.1
>> To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "Ian Campbell" <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>> "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Konrad
>> Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Thursday, July 28, 2011, 3:53 PM
>>
>> On 28/07/2011 20:41, "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
>>
>>> Only 3 CSs backported :-
>>> changeset 23104 - No problems . HVM fix
>>> Next step => 23088 and 23089 . This step causes build failure.
>>
>> Is that 23089:8ec7808f9c23 and 23088:49728fe8dd6a? There is zero chance of
>> either of those being the cause of a build failure under tools/firmware.
>>
>> -- Keir
>>
>>> Boris.
>>>
>>> --- On Thu, 7/28/11, Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx
>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> From: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx </mc/compose?to=keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx> >
>>>> Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: Attempt to backport changeset-23088,
>>>> changeset-23089
>>>> to Xen 4.1.1
>>>> To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> >
>>>> Cc: "Ian Campbell" <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> </mc/compose?to=Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >,
>>>> "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> "
>>>> <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >, "Konrad
>>>> Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>> </mc/compose?to=konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> >
>>>> Date: Thursday, July 28, 2011, 3:04 PM
>>>>
>>>> On 28/07/2011 18:58, "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> > > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Build error :-
>>>>
>>>> The stated changesets don't touch tools/firmware. They're unlikely to be
>>>> causing your build failure.
>>>>
>>>> -- Keir
>>>>
>>>>> Calculated checksum: 0x44 Setting checksum.
>>>>> ls -l VGABIOS-lgpl-latest.cirrus.debug.bin
>>>>> -rw-rw-r-- 1 buildd buildd 35840 Jul 28 17:27
>>>>> VGABIOS-lgpl-latest.cirrus.debug.bin
>>>>> make[8]: Leaving directory
>>>>>
>>>> `/build/buildd/xen-4.1.1/debian/build/build-utils_amd64/tools/firmware/vgab
>>>> io
>>>> s>
>>>> '
>>>>> make[7]: Leaving directory
>>>>> `/build/buildd/xen-4.1.1/debian/build/build-utils_amd64/tools/firmware'
>>>>> make[7]: Entering directory
>>>>> `/build/buildd/xen-4.1.1/debian/build/build-utils_amd64/tools/firmware'
>>>>> /usr/bin/make -C etherboot all
>>>>> make[8]: Entering directory
>>>>> `/build/buildd/xen-4.1.1/debian/build/build-utils_amd64/tools/firmware/eth
>>>>> er
>>>>> bo
>>>>> ot'
>>>>> make[8]: *** No rule to make target `/usr/lib/ipxe/rtl8139.rom', needed by
>>>>> `eb-roms.h'. Stop.
>>>>> make[8]: Leaving directory
>>>>> `/build/buildd/xen-4.1.1/debian/build/build-utils_amd64/tools/firmware/eth
>>>>> er
>>>>> bo
>>>>> ot'
>>>>> make[7]: *** [subdir-all-etherboot] Error 2
>>>>> make[7]: Leaving directory
>>>>> `/build/buildd/xen-4.1.1/debian/build/build-utils_amd64/tools/firmware'
>>>>> make[6]: *** [subdirs-all] Error 2
>>>>> make[6]: Leaving directory
>>>>> `/build/buildd/xen-4.1.1/debian/build/build-utils_amd64/tools/firmware'
>>>>> make[5]: *** [all] Error 2
>>>>> make[5]: Leaving directory
>>>>> `/build/buildd/xen-4.1.1/debian/build/build-utils_amd64/tools/firmware'
>>>>> make[4]: *** [subdir-all-firmware] Error 2
>>>>> make[4]: Leaving directory
>>>>> `/build/buildd/xen-4.1.1/debian/build/build-utils_amd64/tools'
>>>>> make[3]: *** [subdirs-all] Error 2
>>>>> make[3]: Leaving directory
>>>>> `/build/buildd/xen-4.1.1/debian/build/build-utils_amd64/tools'
>>>>> make[2]: *** [debian/stamps/build-utils_amd64] Error 2
>>>>> make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/xen-4.1.1'
>>>>> make[1]: *** [build_amd64_real] Error 2
>>>>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/xen-4.1.1'
>>>>> make: *** [debian/stamps/build-base] Error 2
>>>>> dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
>>>>>
>>>>> Boris.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Problem with Xen 4.1 on Ubuntu 11.10 ( Oneiric Ocelot) (HVM DomUs crash), (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Problem with Xen 4.1 on Ubuntu 11.10 ( Oneiric Ocelot) (HVM DomUs crash), Boris Derzhavets
- [Xen-devel] Attempt to backport changeset-23088, changeset-23089 to Xen 4.1.1, Boris Derzhavets
- [Xen-devel] Re: Attempt to backport changeset-23088, changeset-23089 to Xen 4.1.1, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Attempt to backport changeset-23088, changeset-23089 to Xen 4.1.1, Boris Derzhavets
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Attempt to backport changeset-23088, changeset-23089 to Xen 4.1.1, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Attempt to backport changeset-23088, changeset-23089 to Xen 4.1.1, Boris Derzhavets
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Attempt to backport changeset-23088, changeset-23089 to Xen 4.1.1,
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Attempt to backport changeset-23088, changeset-23089 to Xen 4.1.1- Notice of Ian Campbell, Boris Derzhavets
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Attempt to backport changeset-23088, changeset-23089 to Xen 4.1.1- Notice of Ian Campbell, Stefan Bader
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Attempt to backport changeset-23088, changeset-23089 to Xen 4.1.1- Notice of Ian Campbell, Boris Derzhavets
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Attempt to backport changeset-23088, changeset-23089 to Xen 4.1.1- Notice of Ian Campbell, Boris Derzhavets
- [Xen-devel] problem with xentrace_format in Xen 4.0.1, Zhiyuan Shao
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Problem with Xen 4.1 on Ubuntu 11.10 ( Oneiric Ocelot) (HVM DomUs crash), Boris Derzhavets
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Question on "xen-blkfront: handle Xen major numbers other than XENVBD", Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Question on "xen-blkfront: handle Xen major numbers other than XENVBD", Stefan Bader
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Question on "xen-blkfront: handle Xen major numbers other than XENVBD", Ian Jackson
|
|
|