|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: Issues about domU suspending/resuming
On 28/07/2011 18:16, "Gustavo Pimentel" <gustavo.pimentel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It's not really a bug, but a performance analysis.
> I'm using remus for a HA system and after a system analysis using remus log, I
> notice that suspending a the guest can oscillate between 0.299ms to 812.909ms.
> And the resuming of the same guest oscillates between 0.387ms to 1745,579ms.
> The guest it's a virtual machine with 64MB of RAM, without CPU load.
>
> It's very strange this large range of values of the suspend/resuming of a
> guest.
First point of contact would be the listed Remus maintainer. More data would
be useful I expect -- e.g., does the variation occur with basic live
migration (no Remus)?
-- Keir
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: quinta-feira, 28 de Julho de 2011 18:00
>> To: Gustavo Pimentel
>> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: Issues about domU suspending/resuming
>>
>> On 28/07/2011 17:13, "Gustavo Pimentel" <gustavo.pimentel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, I have looked into the MAINTAINERS file on the xen source, but I didn¹t
>>> find the specific maintainer for responsible for issues about domU
>>> suspending/resuming procedure.
>>> Can you point me to the right person?
>>
>> It crosses multiple subsystems. It could be a guest kernel bug for example,
>> or a toolstack bug. Post a bug report to xen-devel and we can try to triage
>> it.
>>
>> -- Keir
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|