Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable bisection] complete test-i386-i386-pv

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 22.07.11 at 09:42, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-22 at 08:18 +0100, xen.org wrote:
>> branch xen-unstable
>> xen branch xen-unstable
>> job test-i386-i386-pv
>> test guest-start
>> 
>> Tree: linux git://git.eu.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git
>> Tree: qemu git://hg.uk.xensource.com/HG/qemu-xen-unstable.git
>> Tree: xen http://hg.uk.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg 
>> 
>> *** Found and reproduced problem changeset ***
>> 
>>   Bug is in tree:  xen http://hg.uk.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg 
>>   Bug introduced:  0ccb94d533d6
>>   Bug not present: 43f7bdbe47d3
>> 
>> 
>>   changeset:   23721:0ccb94d533d6
>>   user:        Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>   date:        Tue Jul 19 14:09:48 2011 +0100
>>       
>>       build: consolidate buildmakevars2file
>>       
>>       Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Hmm, that looks relatively benign.

Actually, it looks like I erroneously slipped in a change that wasn't
meant to go upstream (I just need this locally so that I can run
several Xen versions in parallel directly out of their build directory):
The patch adds $(DESTDIR) to the front of each variable, and that
is what triggered my consolidation attempt (so a change like this
wouldn't have to applied to each line, but just once). I had been
carrying this change for years, so when I noticed I could send it
upstream, I forgot about that particular aspect. Apologies; will
send a fixup patch in a minute.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel