|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH resubmit] xen-blkfront: Don't send closing notifi
To: |
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH resubmit] xen-blkfront: Don't send closing notification to backend in blkfront_closing() |
From: |
Joe Jin <joe.jin@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:58:50 +0800 |
Cc: |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Kurt C Hackel <KURT.HACKEL@xxxxxxxxxx>, Greg Marsden <greg.marsden@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "annie.li@xxxxxxxxxx" <annie.li@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <jaxboe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "stable@xxxxxxxxxx" <stable@xxxxxxxxxx>, Daniel Stodden <Daniel.Stodden@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Fri, 15 Jul 2011 01:04:13 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<1310634779.634.480.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<4E1CEB34.5090907@xxxxxxxxxx> <1310631209.634.444.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E1EAEE9.80605@xxxxxxxxxx> <1310634779.634.480.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc15 Lightning/1.0b3pre OracleBeehiveExtension/1.0.0.2-OracleInternal ObetStats/CATLAF_1292475699435-498544290 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
On 07/14/11 17:12, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 09:55 +0100, Joe Jin wrote:
>> On 07/14/11 16:13, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 01:47 +0100, Joe Jin wrote:
>
>>>
>>> I'm wondering if we might not be better off deferring the disconnect on
>>> the backend side until the frontend enters XenbusStateClosed instead of
>>> doing it in closing.
>>
>> Yes this fix from backend side works too, also this looks reasonable than
>> fix in frontend.
>
> I guess there is either a missing "more" or "less" in that sentence ;-)
>
> The nice thing about a backend fix is that you don't need to go round
> propagating the fix into distros etc and updating existing deployed
> guests (not to mention non-Linux frontends).
Indeed ;)
>
> I actually thought blkback had something like this already in older
> "classic" Xen kernels but it seems like the patch never made it out of
> the XCP patch queue :-(. See
> http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/XCP/linux-2.6.32.pq.hg/file/tip/CA-7672-blkback-shutdown.patch
> (which appears to also incorporate a toolstack directed graceful
> shutdown of some sort as well as deferring the device close).
>
> Daniel, do you know of any plans to extricate that stuff from the XCP
> patch queue for upstream? Are there any other patches (e.g. incremental
> fixes) in that pq which should go along with it?
Looking forward push this patch to upstream!
Joe
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|