WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix

To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix
From: Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 01:18:51 +0530
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian Campbell <ijc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx, virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 12:49:47 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=wnohang.net; s=mail; t=1310068138; bh=iqE6eM8obX5haVCCLYKxt4SiZuHuU+4r/S7xfjzA7eA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:In-Reply-To; b=pcweFcwxENJPcA+GpwH2fmFDAulmnNdov5qHNP/XsWrvCv62wW5HuFqE9IovZo/x+ 14JBh8RyuumkebtKsDYqI/PlfzD1G5uI/hcjwAPlew23tb/QaPydU+THvQHEl5ZdFC Qo/Z5dy6bIv3ulH4ZMO2b/cj2GIstY7NFZ8XCEIM=
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=wnohang.net; s=mail; t=1310068136; bh=iqE6eM8obX5haVCCLYKxt4SiZuHuU+4r/S7xfjzA7eA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:In-Reply-To; b=EhV1ZJw9oCguidcdHuowBtgOgJ5oei8ugWavg69wEo6zBgfcG3HagJ9LT5qQWFbag kNVkHyuOdLblcN1eFMg8WcreRJHApIHBs0hBsft1+yT7uu/0UO2oUI/xKF7eJaQful h3+8OvL7VvQjdA8b7cUItBoUlnmCh6Tp2hEoAs4s=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20110707162454.GA8164@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20110703232508.GB4440@Xye> <1309769388.634.51.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110704221646.GB4490@Xye> <20110705141323.GG2972@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110705142731.GA4463@Xye> <20110705144846.GA13548@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110705213243.GA3647@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110707154648.GA4394@Xye> <20110707162454.GA8164@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-12-30)
* On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 12:24:54PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 
<konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tested it. Works now.

Ok, Stuck Tested-by on the patch. Hopefully Linus hasn't pulled it yet.
Ok.

Reviewed-by: Raghavendra Prabhu <rprabhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Also,
The condition for acpi_gsi_to_irq can be removed since it always returns zero.

The function might in the future return something that is non-zero
and we should guard for it. Also you make 'irq' be unsigned which is not
good as the IRQ 0 is a valid value - and with making it unsigned if it is
set to -1 (the -1 is the invalid IRQ value) the check for 'irq != gsi'
will be true and and we will pass in -1 casted to unsigned. That is a
large value and not the right thing we want to pass to xen_register_gsi.

My rationale for the unsigned part was that acpi_gsi_to_irq always
assigns a positive value (>= 0) to the irq passed (as unsigned
argument). But even otherwise that shouldn't make much of difference I guess.

Also,
I had sent another change (oneline) for the file
arch/x86/xen/platform-pci-unplug.c for check_platform_magic, looks like that 
has not gone into
the pull request for Linus.


============================================
 diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/xen.c b/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
 index f567965..3faa55b 100644
 --- a/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
 +++ b/arch/x86/pci/xen.c
 @@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ static __init void xen_setup_acpi_sci(void)
         int rc;
         int trigger, polarity;
         int gsi = acpi_sci_override_gsi;
 -       int irq = -1;
 +       unsigned int irq = 0u;
         int gsi_override = -1;

         if (!gsi)
 @@ -435,11 +435,10 @@ static __init void xen_setup_acpi_sci(void)
          * setup as we had setup IRQ 20 for it).
          */
         /* Check whether the GSI != IRQ */
 -       if (acpi_gsi_to_irq(gsi, &irq) == 0) {
 -               if (irq >= 0 && irq != gsi)
 -                       /* Bugger, we MUST have that IRQ. */
 -                       gsi_override = irq;
 -       }
 +       acpi_gsi_to_irq(gsi, &irq);
 +       if (irq != gsi)
 +               /* Bugger, we MUST have that IRQ. */
 +               gsi_override = irq;

         gsi = xen_register_gsi(gsi, gsi_override, trigger, polarity);
         printk(KERN_INFO "xen: acpi sci %d\n", gsi);


--------------------------
Raghavendra Prabhu
GPG Id : 0xD72BE977
Fingerprint: B93F EBCB 8E05 7039 CD3C A4B8 A616 DCA1 D72B E977
www: wnohang.net



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

--------------------------
Raghavendra Prabhu
GPG Id : 0xD72BE977
Fingerprint: B93F EBCB 8E05 7039 CD3C A4B8 A616 DCA1 D72B E977
www: wnohang.net

Attachment: pgp0jPP5AsM5d.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel