xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

[Xen-devel] XCP: ha options: available? not? alternatives?

from [PFarthing]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	<xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-devel] XCP: ha options: available? not? alternatives?
From:	"PFarthing" <pfarthing@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:06:18 -0700
Delivery-date:	Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:07:31 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Importance:	Normal
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi all, I have been getting conflicting information for a couple of weeks now. I would really like to get a definitive answer from a developer as to whether or not the ha component/s from XenServer has been ported to XCP 1.0.

If not, has anything else been implemented in the base system for this?

I see that the params are available: pool-ha-enable, ha_restart_priority, ha_always_run, etc. Do these actually do anything?

To set up a whole cluster just to test this is going to take me some time and some steep learning since so much of this doesn't seem to be documented and is all CLI. It would be really a time saver for me to a least have an idea of what's going to be involved, what's really there, what's not, before I start.

Much Thanks!

- p

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] XCP: ha options: available? not? alternatives?, PFarthing <= Re: [Xen-devel] XCP: ha options: available? not? alternatives?, Pasi Kärkkäinen Re: [Xen-devel] XCP: ha options: available? not? alternatives?, Pasi Kärkkäinen

Previous by Date:	Re: [Xen-devel] libxenstore from 4.1 incompatible with xenstore from 4.0, Bastian Blank
Next by Date:	Re: [Xen-devel] XCP: ha options: available? not? alternatives?, Pasi Kärkkäinen
Previous by Thread:	Re: [Xen-devel] Bug in Xen 4.1.0: Xen leaks tapdisk2 processes, Nathan March
Next by Thread:	Re: [Xen-devel] XCP: ha options: available? not? alternatives?, Pasi Kärkkäinen
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]