Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Issues migrating to xen 4.1 / lv

To:	Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Issues migrating to xen 4.1 / lvm vg for disk
From:	Sylvain CHEVALIER <sylvain.chevalier@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:48:13 +0800
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:49:08 -0700
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=g+Cr/s7ag5FH+K8NxjS8WNh/4RBKpmXt88jezDacGvU=; b=ak6p4FX3fv3lJ1Kc7Itk+wH6VnTxfMpyPiLffkt4YfB86G5DACIniTvS1wTxQUGP3z eToeq+qQcVdlpAy6ZtzkknspZHFcGiDTOBqIqVPcB55jOnO7gVt2uIvN2gTRCyQ89kGD MX/vCp/CBle8eXF9p7h8IqQxiN8tS16uCae/w=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=W2t/pXLVYLxFl6mJyfmCgdv6hcBAtpH7k3+DyLd9r8bdhVHtt0UWG2+PoAkFXwpMpa lJX0rQzmnrM4StDnvDTMT33+pWeW26Z9I4J6KJnwk/Qi8KaYYYNiNWq+dRK4TdcfOklK ot0+BuR80KA58l7Hlr7KRC6hd78r1Z6IFmu24=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20110428193315.GJ32595@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<BANLkTikc2VGspO2icP335+e+3vLev9uYgg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110410192622.GK32595@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20110428193315.GJ32595@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi Pasi,

Thanks a lot for following up. We had to change this part of our
config files when we moved from xm to xl.

Sylvain

On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> (added Ian as CC).
>
> While talking about supported disk configuration syntax,
> I remembered this report again..
>
> Sylvain: Did you use 'xl' or 'xm' ?
>
> -- Pasi
>
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:26:22PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 12:56:05PM +0800, Sylvain CHEVALIER wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > We just migrated xen on gentoo on amd64 from 4.0 to 4.1 and
>> > encountered a few issues that were not documented. Here is how we
>> > solved them and what issues are remaining:
>> >
>> > 1. Our config files were referring to the LVM devices like
>> > /dev/vg/domU-root with disk = [ 'phy:vg/domU-root,sda1,w' ]. This does
>> > not work anymore, we have to include '/dev/': disk = [
>> > 'phy:/dev/vg/domU-root,sda1,w' ].
>> >
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I added xen-devel to CC list.
>> (I'll reply your other questions on another email.)
>>
>> -- Pasi
>>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Issues migrating to xen 4.1 / lvm vg for