|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:61
|
To: |
MaoXiaoyun <tinnycloud@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "jeremy@xxxxxxxx" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
RE: [Xen-devel] RE: Kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:61 |
|
From: |
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:55:50 +0800 |
|
Accept-language: |
en-US |
|
Acceptlanguage: |
en-US |
|
Cc: |
xen devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "giamteckchoon@xxxxxxxxx" <giamteckchoon@xxxxxxxxx>, "konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx" <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Mon, 25 Apr 2011 22:57:59 -0700 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<BLU157-w15A2BBA7C03E899C3272EDA960@xxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
References: |
<COL0-MC1-F14hmBzxHs00230882@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <BLU157-w488E5FEBD5E2DBC0666EF1DAA70@xxxxxxx>, <BLU157-w5025BFBB4B1CDFA7AA0966DAA90@xxxxxxx>, <BLU157-w540B39FBA137B4D96278D2DAA90@xxxxxxx>, <BANLkTimgh_iip27zkDPNV9r7miwbxHmdVg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <BANLkTimkMgYNyANcKiZu5tJTL4==zdP3xg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <BLU157-w116F1BB57ABFDE535C7851DAA80@xxxxxxx>, <4DA3438A.6070503@xxxxxxxx>, <BLU157-w2C6CD57CEA345B8D115E8DAAB0@xxxxxxx>, <BLU157-w36F4E0A7503A357C9DE6A3DAAB0@xxxxxxx>, <20110412100000.GA15647@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <BLU157-w14B84A51C80B41AB72B6CBDAAD0@xxxxxxx>, <BANLkTinNxLnJxtZD68ODLSJqafq0tDRPfw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <BLU157-w30A1A208238A9031F0D18EDAAD0@xxxxxxx>, <BLU157-w383D1A2536480BCD4C0E0EDAAD0@xxxxxxx>, <BLU157-w42DAD248C94153635E9749DAAC0@xxxxxxx>, <4DA8B715.9080508@xxxxxxxx>, <BLU157-w3221B2A034DA7D179CB8D0DA960@xxxxxxx>, <BLU157-w631135A14B22DA4A7FCEC5DA960@xxxxxxx>, <BLU157-w1963BE0D46AB93FDA390CBDA960@xxxxxxx> <BLU157-w15A2BBA7C03E899C3272EDA960@xxxxxxx> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Thread-index: |
AcwDWlWOPs2ymfnQSJSWoihOZEL2YAAe+IwA |
|
Thread-topic: |
[Xen-devel] RE: Kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:61 |
the race window is always there, but whether it will be triggered is not determined. It’s possible that you never met this bug on 2.6.31.x now, but it doesn’t mean you won’t meet it in long run in the future. J Thanks Kevin From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of MaoXiaoyun
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 11:05 PM
To: jeremy@xxxxxxxx
Cc: xen devel; giamteckchoon@xxxxxxxxx; konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] RE: Kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:61 Please ignore my last two mails, I just learnt that Current is meanless in irq context.
Just come up one whole assumption:
In my opinion:
1) CPU running in switch_mm has the possiblity of receiving IPI message and enter interrupt
2) Before revert that patch, not matter the if statement is true or not, the cpu_tlbstate.state
could be changed to TLBSTATE_OK, right before enter irq routhine
3) Since the cpu_tlbstate is per CPU variable, before calling leave_mm(), test cpu_tlbstate.state
in drop_other_mm_ref is feasible and nessary
4) If I am right, strange thing is the code of 2.6.32.36 is same as 2.6.31.x, which we never met tlb bug before.
any comments?
Many thanks.
|
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
Home