WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 		  
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Xen-devel] where is xen_restore_fl_direct_end,i can not find

from [Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: yue <ooolinux@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] where is xen_restore_fl_direct_end,i can not find
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 09:33:49 -0400
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 06:35:16 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <19113c48.17bd.12f80235169.Coremail.ooolinux@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <19113c48.17bd.12f80235169.Coremail.ooolinux@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) 
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 10:14:48AM +0800, yue wrote:
> 1.if xen.4.0.tar  and kernel/arch/xen  is all code?

It is in the Linux kernel code.
> 
> thansk

> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [Xen-devel] RE: Kernel BUG at arch/x86/mm/tlb.c:61, MaoXiaoyun
Next by Date:  Re: [Xen-devel] if hvm better than pv?why dd in hvm vm no larger than 50M, while pv greater than 50, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Previous by Thread:  [Xen-devel] where is xen_restore_fl_direct_end,i can not find, yue
Next by Thread:  [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 6905: tolerable FAIL, xen . org
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]
 
   

Copyright , Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy