WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH] Xen blkback for 2.6.40.

To: Daniel Stodden <daniel.stodden@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH] Xen blkback for 2.6.40.
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:12:16 -0400
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:15:35 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1303151824.9965.72.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1303149464-875-1-git-send-email-konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> <1303151824.9965.72.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:37:04AM -0700, Daniel Stodden wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 13:57 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > I am proposing this patch for 2.6.40. This is an RFC at this point.
> > 
> > The git tree for this specific patch is
> >     git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git 
> > devel/xen-blkback-v3.squashed
> > 
> > (the full tree is devel/xen-blkback-v3)
> > 
> > Please take a look at the patch. I know that I need to rewrite the 
> > description
> > to have more details for the upstream community - and that will be shortly 
> > supplied.
> > 
> > Any thoughts on what I should address/remove/augment/etc would be 
> > appreciated. And whether
> > the code has any obvious pitfalls?
> > 
> > The code was originally lifted from 2.6.18, then ported to 2.6.32, and now 
> > I have backported
> > it to 2.6.38/.39. scripts/checkpatch.pl had been applied and also some 
> > re-ordering of the code
> > has been done to make it easier to read.
> 
> If propose to consider eliminating vbd.c and interface.c, inlining the
> critical bits where they belong, respectively.

Ok. Let me take an axe to that.
> 
> Leaving only blkback.c for the data- and xenbus.c for the control path.

<nods>
> 
> I don't think there's anything notable in there which has more than a
> single position to call it from. It always looked like out of some
> abstraction layer to me, maybe with blktap1 in mind. Beyond that, I
> don't see that getting anywhere.
> 
> Daniel
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>