|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: system freeze when processor.ko is loaded
To: |
"Wang, Winston L" <winston.l.wang@xxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: system freeze when processor.ko is loaded |
From: |
Martin Wilck <mwilck@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Apr 2011 21:38:59 +0200 |
Cc: |
"Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, KeirFraser <keir@xxxxxxx>, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>, "Dugger, Donald D" <donald.d.dugger@xxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Li, Xin" <xin.li@xxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Sun, 17 Apr 2011 11:48:07 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<54B2EB610B7F1340BB6A0D4CA04A4F100100C0A0A2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Openpgp: |
id=70700BF2 |
References: |
<d6cfc1ce-e4b3-47dc-ae83-8d0c341988b3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <54B2EB610B7F1340BB6A0D4CA04A4F1001008E2FED@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4DA41545020000780003B00F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <54B2EB610B7F1340BB6A0D4CA04A4F1001008E35D9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4DA563F0020000780003B4B3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <54B2EB610B7F1340BB6A0D4CA04A4F100100C0A0A2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110221 SUSE/3.1.8 Thunderbird/3.1.8 |
Hi,
> Sounds good, I don't have the failed the processors
> Martin, does Jan's patch fix the problem of your failed platform?
Yes, Jan's patch (on top of the OpenSUSE Xen release) worked well for me.
>> clearly secondary (and honestly I don't think anyone wants to waste
>> cycles on improving this for the few old processors that are still out
>> there and that Xen is being run on).
> Agree.
As you may imagine, I am not too happy about that, but I understand that
the lead Xen developers have different priorities.
Martin
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|