Re: [Xen-devel] [SPAM] Re: kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860

To:	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] [SPAM] Re: kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860! - ideas.
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 06 Apr 2011 14:52:51 -0700
Cc:	Dave Hunter <dave@xxxxxxxxxx>, Teck Choon Giam <giamteckchoon@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Wed, 06 Apr 2011 14:53:49 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<1302076419.27835.0.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<AANLkTimin0OZZUmvUr2KcXugc_2GGuEhRHLdug1ufha6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110308192950.GA4562@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110308201002.GA5721@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTikdA0vnxYzU7MFZNk3m6SH6=ns-WGVry2zCfws+@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1299617407852-3414620.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110309004318.GB10007@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D77251F.8070709@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20110309150023.GB6247@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D77DC0A.9090705@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4D78D5DE.4000609@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20110316155220.GA15150@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D907314.1040603@xxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTi=WtS4hgOjg63H1TU+89i03_cPnJzNgbTfgxqLo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1302040916.2042.108.camel@dave> <BANLkTin11DvmRtSoowMuei1UkAH9My01tQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1302045633.2042.111.camel@dave> <1302076419.27835.0.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110307 Fedora/3.1.9-0.39.b3pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.9

On 04/06/2011 12:53 AM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Please don't top post.
>
> On Wed, 2011-04-06 at 00:20 +0100, Dave Hunter wrote:
>> Is it likely that Debian would release an updated kernel in squeeze with
>> this configuration?  (sorry, this might not be the place to ask).
> I doubt they will, enabling DEBUG_PAGEALLOC seems very much like a
> workaround not a solution to me.

Yes, it will impose a pretty large performance overhead.

    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [SPAM] Re: kernel BUG at arch/x86/xen/mmu.c:1860! - idea