[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] x86: guest_walk_tables() should check in

At 09:11 +0100 on 28 Mar (1301303519), Jan Beulich wrote:
> The PSE handling doesn't check bits 1...8 (or 1...9 for non-PAE guests)
> being zero, thus allowing bad (not 2Mb/4Mb aligned) large pages to be
> handled.

Applied; thank you.

Tim.

-- 
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Principal Software Engineer, Xen Platform Team
Citrix Systems UK Ltd.  (Company #02937203, SL9 0BG)

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] x86: guest_walk_tables() should check invalid bits on large page entries, Tim Deegan <=

Previous by Date:

Re: LAST_CHECKPOINT and save/restore/migrate compatibility (was Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3 of 4] libxc: provide notification of final checkpoint to restore end), George Dunlap

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Nested Virtualisation question, Tim Deegan

Previous by Thread:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Re-alphabetize Xen entries., Ian Campbell

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] Question about page table used by hypervisor, Tim Deegan

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]