WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH V4 4/5] cpuidle: driver for xen

To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC PATCH V4 4/5] cpuidle: driver for xen
From: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:26:25 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: venki@xxxxxxxxxx, ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, suresh.b.siddha@xxxxxxxxx, sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Trinabh Gupta <trinabh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 14:28:25 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1103302159010.1920@x980>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20110322123208.28725.30945.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110322123324.28725.3131.stgit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110322145054.GB26952@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D89C40B.4020809@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.LFD.2.02.1103231659210.12911@x980> <20110324120522.GB29294@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D8CA902.7090907@xxxxxxxx> <alpine.LFD.2.02.1103302159010.1920@x980>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Alpine 2.02 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14)
> > >> xen_arch_setup() does this:
> > >>
> > >>         pm_idle = default_idle;
> > >>         boot_option_idle_override = IDLE_HALT;

What happens on a Xen kernel if these lines are not there?
Does Xen export the C-states tables to Dom0 kernel, and the Dom0
kernel has an acpi processor driver, and thus it would try to
use all the C-states?

If yes, must Xen show those tables to Dom?
If it did not, then the lines above would not be necessary,
as in the absence of any C-states, the kernel should
use halt by default.

thanks,
-Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel