|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 6690: regressions - FAIL
flight 6690 xen-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/6690/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking:
build-i386-oldkern 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 6658
build-i386 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 6658
test-amd64-amd64-pair 16 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 6658
test-amd64-amd64-pv 9 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 6658
test-amd64-amd64-win 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 6658
test-amd64-i386-pair 6 xen-install/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 6658
test-amd64-i386-pair 5 xen-install/src_host fail REGR. vs. 6658
test-amd64-i386-pv 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 6658
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 6658
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 6658
test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 6658
test-amd64-i386-win 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 6658
test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 6658
test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 6658
test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 6658
test-amd64-i386-xl 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 6658
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-pair 6 xen-install/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 6658
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-pair 5 xen-install/src_host fail REGR. vs. 6658
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-pv 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 6658
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 6658
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 6658
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-win 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 6658
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-credit2 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 6658
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-multivcpu 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 6658
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-win 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 6658
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 6658
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking,
including regressions (tests previously passed) regarded as allowable:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-i386-i386-pair 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-i386-i386-pv 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-i386-i386-win 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-i386-i386-xl-win 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-i386-i386-xl 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-i386-xcpkern-i386-pair 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-i386-xcpkern-i386-pv 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-i386-xcpkern-i386-win 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-i386-xcpkern-i386-xl 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
version targeted for testing:
xen 48dac730a93b
baseline version:
xen a65612bcbb92
------------------------------------------------------------
People who touched revisions under test:
Gang Wei <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx>
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
------------------------------------------------------------
jobs:
build-i386-xcpkern pass
build-amd64 pass
build-i386 fail
build-amd64-oldkern pass
build-i386-oldkern fail
build-amd64-pvops pass
build-i386-pvops pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl pass
test-amd64-i386-xl fail
test-i386-i386-xl blocked
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl fail
test-i386-xcpkern-i386-xl blocked
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd fail
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-rhel6hvm-amd fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 fail
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-credit2 fail
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel fail
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-rhel6hvm-intel fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu fail
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-multivcpu fail
test-amd64-amd64-pair fail
test-amd64-i386-pair fail
test-i386-i386-pair blocked
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-pair fail
test-i386-xcpkern-i386-pair blocked
test-amd64-amd64-pv fail
test-amd64-i386-pv fail
test-i386-i386-pv blocked
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-pv fail
test-i386-xcpkern-i386-pv blocked
test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-amd64-win fail
test-amd64-i386-win fail
test-i386-i386-win blocked
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-win fail
test-i386-xcpkern-i386-win blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win fail
test-i386-i386-xl-win blocked
test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-win fail
------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on woking.cam.xci-test.com
logs: /home/xc_osstest/logs
images: /home/xc_osstest/images
Logs, config files, etc. are available at
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs
Test harness code can be found at
http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary
Not pushing.
------------------------------------------------------------
changeset: 23103:48dac730a93b
tag: tip
user: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
date: Sat Mar 26 09:42:01 2011 +0000
x86: __pirq_guest_eoi() must check it is called for a fully
guest-bound irq before accessing desc->action.
Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
changeset: 23102:8f001d864fef
user: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
date: Sat Mar 26 09:30:38 2011 +0000
x86/ATS: remove unreferenced lock member from struct pci_ats_dev
Otherwise this may give the false impression that some explicit
locking is done in this code.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
changeset: 23101:dd386a4b6595
user: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
date: Sat Mar 26 09:30:04 2011 +0000
x86: fix tboot after c/s 23013:65d26504e843 (ACPI cleanup)
TXT code calls acpi_parse_dmar() with a transient copy of the DMAR
table, and hence storing the pointer for later reference was wrong.
Obtain the pointer in acpi_dmar_init() instead.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Gang Wei <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx>
changeset: 23100:ef8dd40422c8
user: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
date: Sat Mar 26 08:27:41 2011 +0000
Remove spin_barrier_irq(). It is pointless.
Add a barrier-appropriate consistency check to spinlock.c, and add
code comments to explain why barrier operations are more relaxed than
lock-acquisition operations.
Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
changeset: 23099:612171ff82ea
user: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
date: Sat Mar 26 08:03:21 2011 +0000
rwlock: Allow to scale to 2^31-1 readers on x86.
Also rework to match the 'trylock' style of raw function used for
spinlocks.
Inspired by Jan Beulich's patch to do similar improved scaling.
Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
changeset: 23098:c9f745c153ec
user: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
date: Fri Mar 25 21:59:20 2011 +0000
tools: vnet: Remove
Build has been broken since at least 18969:d6889b3b6423 (early
2009) and it has been unhooked from the top level build since forever
AFAICT. The last actual development (as opposed to tree wide
cleanups and build fixes) appears to have been 11594:6d7bba6443ef in
2006. The functionality of vnet has apparently been superceded by
VLANs, ebtables, Ethernet-over-IP etc all of which are well integrated
with upstream kernels and distros.
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
changeset: 23097:2aeebd5cbbad
user: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
date: Fri Mar 25 21:47:57 2011 +0000
Remove unmaintained Access Control Module (ACM) from hypervisor.
Signed-off-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
changeset: 23096:a65612bcbb92
user: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
date: Fri Mar 25 09:03:17 2011 +0000
x86/hpet: eliminate cpumask_lock
According to the (now getting removed) comment in struct
hpet_event_channel, this was to prevent accessing a CPU's
timer_deadline after it got cleared from cpumask. This can be done
without a lock altogether - hpet_broadcast_exit() can simply clear
the bit, and handle_hpet_broadcast() can read timer_deadline before
looking at the mask a second time (the cpumask bit was already
found set by the surrounding loop).
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Gang Wei <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx>
(qemu changes not included)
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 6690: regressions - FAIL,
xen . org <=
|
|
|
|
|