On 03/23/2011 08:43 AM, Len Brown wrote:
Why is this patch a step forward?
Hi Len,
I have basically moved the code for arch default and mwait
idle from arch/x86/kernel/process.c to a driver. This was
suggested by Venki (https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/10/19/460)
as part of pm_idle cleanup and direct call of
cpuidle_idle_call(). There is not much new code here.
+obj-$(CONFIG_X86) += default_driver.o
BTW, that's a pretty generic name for an x86 specific idle driver...
I think that on builds that support intel_idle and acpi_idle,
everything in this file will be unused, unless somebody uses some
debugging cmdline params that should have been deleted ages ago.
Yes, I agree that the name has to be x86 specific. I think the
routines would be used for pre-nehalem architectures that use
arch default or mwait.
Thanks,
-Trinabh
thanks,
Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
| 
Home