On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 16:20 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 23.03.11 at 15:47, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I'd prefer something a tiny bit more descriptive, like "xentrace:", but
> > I would acquiesce to xtb if someone felt strongly about it.
>
> I was nagging just because "Xen trace buffers: " seemed overly long
> to me. I'm fine with your preference.
I agree that "Xen trace buffers" is too long -- debug output on a serial
line is somewhat precious when your machine is crashing. :-)
Olaf, are you OK with making the prefix consistently "xentrace"?
-George
>
> Jan
>
> > -George
> >
> > On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 11:18 +0000, Olaf Hering wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 23, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>
> >> > >>> On 22.03.11 at 20:21, Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > > # HG changeset patch
> >> > > # User Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> > > # Date 1300813820 -3600
> >> > > # Node ID dcbae547cce81f10c243d54bd35fd139615313cb
> >> > > # Parent e58f6949e76a2786c4f5a99a0da44ee58743b4df
> >> > > xentrace: use consistent printk prefix
> >> >
> >> > Why "Xen trace buffers: " and not e.g. "xtb: "?
> >>
> >> Its used in other printk calls already.
> >> George, would a change to xtb: be ok for you for all existing printk calls?
> >>
> >> Olaf
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home