[Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] (xen) pm-bug-fixes for 2.6.32

[Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 03/21/2011 03:13 AM, Shriram Rajagopalan wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> Can you please pull
>
> git://athos.nss.cs.ubc.ca/linux-2.6-pvops.git

> <http://athos.nss.cs.ubc.ca/linux-2.6-pvops.git> xen/pm-bug-fix

>
> #xen/pm-bug-fix is based off xen/next-2.6.32,
> commit ea954f6ff4ff5c15c9e2120e86335f6d6490ae0f
> "Merge commit 'konrad-xen/for-2.6.32/bug-fixes~1' into xen/next-2.6.32"
>
> All patches in this branch have been merged into upstream kernel.

Are they marked to go into the stable/longterm tree, or are we just
going to maintain them separately?

I think these should go into the longterm tree. I am a bit clueless as to what you
exactly mean by "maintaining them separately". I thought next-2.6.32 was meant
as a staging area, that later gets pushed to stable-2.6.32.x

Konrad/Ian ?

shriram
   J

>
> The diffstat:
>
>  drivers/xen/manage.c                       |   16 ++++++++--------
>  drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c          |   12 ++++++++++--
>  drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.h          |    3 ++-
>  drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_frontend.c |   26
> ++++++++++++++++----------
>  include/xen/xenbus.h                       |    2 +-
>  5 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> Kazuhiro SUZUKI (1):
>      xen: xenbus PM events support
>
> Shriram Rajagopalan (1):
>       xen: use freeze/restore/thaw PM events for suspend/resume/chkpt
>
> shriram

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel