|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH]: Allow tools to map arbitrarily large mach
On Mon, 2011-03-14 at 16:58 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> > It's 1GB which is enough to cover 1TB of host memory, which AFAIK is
> all
> > we support these days. It certainly buys us time compared with
> currently
> > failing at 160GB.
>
> 1Tb of *contiguous* host memory. And that's certainly not the limit
> Xen has been run on, and Xen itself is set up to handle 5Tb. Which
> I'm seeing to get exceeded on experimental(?) systems...
>
> And while I agree that failing at 1Tb is better than failing at 160Gb,
> I favor fixing this once and completely over doing a little bit of
> papering over the problem now just to require debugging the same
> issue again later.
Maybe a comment or a printk() would be advisable here then in the mean
time?
Gianni
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|