On 24.02.2011, at 18:59, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 02/24/2011 11:46 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-02-24 18:27, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/24/2011 10:25 AM, Anthony PERARD wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 16:11, Anthony Liguori<anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Is this really necessary? The advantage to building globally is that it
>>>>> keeps the code from getting unnecessary i386-isms.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Nop, is not necessary, I add this patch after this mail:
>>>> http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2010-12/msg00044.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Alex, do you feel strongly here?
>>>
>> I'm not Alex, but I brought this issue up:
>>
>> Either build xen bits once for all archs or restrict it to the only
>> foreseeable arch with support in qemu. But please don't built it for
>> each and every target separately.
>>
>
> Oh yes, I misunderstood. I thought we had previously built it for all
> architectures. Yes, we should only build it once.
There's really no point in building it for anything but x86. Xen has never had
been broadly used in PV mode on non-x86. Not sure ports even exist.
Alex
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|