| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: do not rely on guest to respond when forc
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 14:58 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > OK, fair enough. Honestly, I think my expectation for the detach case to
> > be more as I stated, but I don't feel strongly about it and it would
> > just add complexity to have it that way.
>
> That's the non--force'd way of doing it and AFAICT it behaves pretty
> much as you describe.
Except that the non-force way will bail if the guest doesn't respond and
leave everything as it is so that the device can still function.
How I described is try to play nice but before returning to caller -
make sure everything is removed.
Anyway, it's a minor point.
Gianni
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home