|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 8] Allow building xen with clang/llvm
These and the first LTO one are all fine by me.
Acked-by: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
On 07/03/2011 11:26, "Tim Deegan" <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This series of patches allows Xen builds with clang/llvm as well as
> GCC. It only fixes Xen, not tools &c, and only 64-bit, so far.
>
> Building Xen with clang isn't useful in itself (and indeed produces
> a hypervisor that can be up to 10% slower for a default -O2 build);
> rather it's a stepping-stone to doing full link-time optimizations
> on the LLVM bitcode of the whole hypervisor. I will post a second
> series to enable that, but it's not so clean as this one.
>
> I think all the changes in this series are reasonable and won't
> inconvenience any normal users, but obviously they're meant for
> the xen-unstable tree only.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tim.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 5 of 8] credit2: remove two nested functions, replacing them with static ones, (continued)
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 8] Allow building xen with clang/llvm,
Keir Fraser <=
|
|
|
|
|