|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support"):
> > On Tue, 2011-03-01 at 12:31 +0000, Vincent Hanquez wrote:
> > > xenops support passing arbitrary extra arguments to qemu-dm, so I will
> > > suggest someone add the same feature to xl.
> >
> > libxl has the support but it's not plumbed through to xl :-(
>
> This ought to be fixed for 4.1 I think. It's quite an important
> escape hatch.
>
I am ok with having this in 4.1.
At this point we could have the two lines fix to support dm_args as well
(libxenlight already supports optional device model arguments, we just
need to parse dm_args in xl).
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support, Christoph Egger
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support, Gianni Tedesco
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support, Vincent Hanquez
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support, Ian Jackson
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support,
Stefano Stabellini <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support, Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support, Ian Jackson
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support, Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm: floppy support, Ian Jackson
|
|
|
|
|