WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] abnormal CPU utilization

To: "'xen devel'" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] abnormal CPU utilization
From: tinnycloud <tinnycloud@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:50:04 +0800
Cc: george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 05:50:38 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <BLU157-w4D1373DA10542CD117D96DAFD0@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <BLU157-ds1E01DEBE18840E5FBB6D1DA0E0@xxxxxxx>, <AANLkTikBaB5awvRu3Sn3WfuoS3LRmeBH=pG8c7H1n4Cw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <AANLkTinoXve=zBzB9qN1qXRz+iJmhiQ+-gB7MwFoY5Dg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <20110112105405.GH5651@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <BLU157-w59C63325262D0BE99E6C43DAF10@xxxxxxx>, <20110112140223.GI5651@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <BLU157-w1861EFE53CB51FC710011FDAF10@xxxxxxx>, <AANLkTimOz_uauDEnu_XaPEgwD1EZJWEgOO1oiFccFNs1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <20110113092427.GJ5651@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <AANLkTinSga8xDkuH0BsqbhbBtvgwgbn=T0qmg9y9CeGr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <20110113155344.GN5651@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <BLU157-w507CBBB94539BFDB92B339DAF30@xxxxxxx>, <AANLkTimC9OYTiHYaeeytH5OCN-EF2v6L=KDVMwBjtB0z@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <BLU157-w995512A939ADE678A6401DAF40@xxxxxxx>, <AANLkTikj6gJ2we+3FcfmqdeSkrvBFyj=p6R47UcmS3Rk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <BLU157-w2585BD724B146B97F474F7DAF70@xxxxxxx>, <BLU157-w64986DB011F8A390A99E33DAF70@xxxxxxx>, <BLU157-w332A4D877032F4B946D4DDAF60@xxxxxxx>, <AANLkTi=YfEpAXU7Vyqn_rbc+hbeVBUE8wiL6MrktE+Mw@xxxxxx mail.com > <BLU157-w4D1373DA10542CD117D96DAFD0@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acu7tWDvYSeQzoScQ2u9WV+lKbNQgwSI28Uw

Hi George:

 

         We have observed abnormal CPU utilization behavior on our HVMS.

 

         There are two same physical hosts, with exactly same Xen and dom0 kernel installed,

The host owns 24G memory and 16 CPUS.

On each of the host, a HVM is running.

(WIN2008, 16G MEM, 8VCPUS, derive from same base VHD image)

 

That is  we have same HVMA, HVMB on different host.

 

Some days after, HVMA behaves quite abnormal, every time I start an application inside VM,

its CPU utilization  grows and drops very quickly(up to 80%), so it feels that the system is very lag.

While, HVMB works fine.

 

So it makes me to guess that processes on HVMA consume more CPU than HVMB.

 

Later, I run superPI tests on both HVMS, calculate 320million PI.

Here is the result.

 

                                                       HVMA                             HVMB

End of initialization. Time:  2min, 54 Sec.                12sec

         1st time completion:            5min, 05 Sec                        49 sec

         2nd time completion:            6min, 14 Sec                      1min, 32sec

          3rd time completion:            7min,  17Sec                      2min 14 sec

         4th time completion :            8min  22, sec                     2min 57

         5th time completion :            9min , 48 sec                     3min 40

                          …….                              ……                                             ……

          24th time completion             29min 52                           16min 59

        

 

         From the data above, the initialization  time of superPI for HVMA is much slower than HVMB.

         And every calculation of PI for HVMA is a bit slower than HVMB.

 

         How could this happen, could you enlighten me some?

         Many thanks.

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [Xen-devel] abnormal CPU utilization, tinnycloud <=