RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] hvmloader: add "wakeup from S4 on RTC alarm"bit to ACPI FADT

[Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I believe the test *requires* S4 support. Some others require S3 support, with 
similar RTC wake.

  Paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-devel-
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Keir Fraser
> Sent: 04 February 2011 15:05
> To: Paolo Bonzini; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] hvmloader: add "wakeup from S4 on
> RTC alarm"bit to ACPI FADT
> 
> On 04/02/2011 14:52, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > hvmloader: add "wakeup from S4 on RTC alarm" bit to ACPI FADT
> >
> > Testing Xen with Microsoft's Windows logo tests reveals a non-
> fatal
> > failure in the "CHAOS" test (more precisely in the PwrTest
> subjob).
> >
> > The test expects to be able to hibernate the machine and have it
> power
> > up again via the RTC.  We do not really care about implementing
> the
> > exact timing in the management (and neither does MS) so their
> request
> > can be easily by manually restarting the VM or even via
> > on_poweroff="restart" (granted, that's not something you'd usually
> do).
> >
> > Ok?
> 
> Does a non-fatal error actually matter to passing a Windows logo
> test? After all it seems more correct to not advertise a feature we
> don't actually support, regardless of what Microsoft would prefer.
> 
>  -- Keir
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel