WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 5352: regressions - FAIL

To: "xen.org" <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 5352: regressions - FAIL
From: George Dunlap <dunlapg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:15:54 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 03:16:42 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=7NqlAng4Lt4oA6TptAfgTu1iEOLXyYgNnSPTvGo6NU0=; b=Akux7FNALvMC73dbjMB4NTl5UBWFbHZ6KmyXDjOc2WFjRp6LnlOYdelFaUufj3XVcf ImkpL51fyyZlOaoYWZTQbQNv0MBSniQ6fLz/CZE30JTCY6Zxr4lpUN9jZxdUYD0E3j6q DwSJWInLrwUfhJDa+9LXPWcSnhVck6y5CUy84=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=OTVeBy/Kcn5mD5tEpJDioFX7z9RdmUFXbzJDDhbXeP/J/fjxO6beKrExHwjcG2dFGK bNuKmZhgPJBdVosXbch89Nc6BFflMAaUGGO2QwNA4Ihk9VYwz2QSHYP/vI8XNB/PpTdw JFMu8kA9vukpS8AD1MbJX3nD4Bp68VSK+tolc=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <osstest-5352-mainreport@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <osstest-5352-mainreport@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 5:49 AM, xen.org <ian.jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> flight 5352 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/5352/
...
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking:
>  test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu  9 guest-start                fail REGR. vs. 
> 5237
>  test-amd64-i386-xl            9 guest-start                fail REGR. vs. 
> 5237
>  test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-pv    9 guest-start                fail REGR. vs. 
> 5237
>  test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl-credit2  9 guest-start          fail REGR. vs. 
> 5237
>  test-amd64-xcpkern-i386-xl    9 guest-start                fail REGR. vs. 
> 5237
>  test-i386-xcpkern-i386-pair  16 guest-start                fail REGR. vs. 
> 5237

All of these seem to be failing because it can't find the dhcp address
after boot:

011-01-27 03:50:58 Z FAILURE: guest debian.guest.osstest
5a:36:0e:e8:00:15 22 link/ip/tcp: wait timed out:
/var/lib/dhcp3/dhcpd.leases:755: lease without `hardware ethernet'.
failure: guest debian.guest.osstest 5a:36:0e:e8:00:15 22 link/ip/tcp:
wait timed out: /var/lib/dhcp3/dhcpd.leases:755: lease without
`hardware ethernet'.

However, the guest console log indicates that it has actually booted,
and received an IP address:

DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 8
DHCPOFFER from 10.80.248.4
DHCPREQUEST on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67
DHCPACK from 10.80.248.4
bound to 10.80.249.225 -- renewal in 758 seconds.
done.

Not sure why this only failed for the 32-on-64-bit cases, but it seems
like some (perhaps temporary) flakiness in the code trying to find the
dhcp address.

 -George

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>