|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 13/14] x86/ticketlock: add slowpath logic
To: |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 13/14] x86/ticketlock: add slowpath logic |
From: |
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Jan 2011 20:52:22 +0530 |
Cc: |
Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxx>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, Eric Dumazet <dada1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>, suzuki@xxxxxxxxxx, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@xxxxxxxxx>, Linux Virtualization <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Mon, 17 Jan 2011 07:23:26 -0800 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<97ed99ae9160bdb6477284b333bd6708fb7a19cb.1289940821.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<cover.1289940821.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx> <97ed99ae9160bdb6477284b333bd6708fb7a19cb.1289940821.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Reply-to: |
vatsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 01:08:44PM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Maintain a flag in both LSBs of the ticket lock which indicates whether
> anyone is in the lock slowpath and may need kicking when the current
> holder unlocks. The flags are set when the first locker enters
> the slowpath, and cleared when unlocking to an empty queue.
>
> In the specific implementation of lock_spinning(), make sure to set
> the slowpath flags on the lock just before blocking. We must do
> this before the last-chance pickup test to prevent a deadlock
> with the unlocker:
>
> Unlocker Locker
> test for lock pickup
> -> fail
> test slowpath + unlock
> -> false
> set slowpath flags
> block
>
> Whereas this works in any ordering:
>
> Unlocker Locker
> set slowpath flags
> test for lock pickup
> -> fail
> block
> test slowpath + unlock
> -> true, kick
I think this is still racy ..
Unlocker Locker
test slowpath
-> false
set slowpath flag
test for lock pickup
-> fail
block
unlock
unlock needs to happen first before testing slowpath? I have made that change
for my KVM guest and it seems to be working well with that change .. Will
cleanup and post my patches shortly
- vatsa
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 13/14] x86/ticketlock: add slowpath logic,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <=
|
|
|
|
|