| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xend: drbd improvements
Ian Jackson wrote:
> Jim Fehlig writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xend: drbd improvements"):
>
>> Have you had a chance to test my suggestion above (reverting c/s 19444
>> and using the xend patch we have in SuSE)? It has been working well for
>> us, but another "Tested-by:" may convince upstream to take these changes
>> as well. Perhaps it is too late for 4.1 as we're at RC2 already.
>>
>
> I'd love to have another test report.
Shriram reported that he successfully tested these changes.
> I didn't apply these patches
> because it wasn't clear to me exactly what the proposed changes were
> and, as you say, that they had been sufficiently tested.
>
The revert of c/s 19444 simply removes more 'drbd' cruft from xend
internals.
As for my xend patch, is the commit message that vague?
-------------------------
xend: improve psudeo-bootloader support for external block scripts
Userspace tools support external block scripts (e.g. block-drbd
provided by drbd project). The psuedo-bootloader setup code in
xend has a few limitations wrt external block scripts, which this
patch addresses.
blkif.py: parse_uname() utility function should be able to parse a
disk specifier understood by the rest of the tools.
XendDomainInfo.py: Block devices using external block scripts must
be attached to dom0 before running the psuedo-bootloader.
-------------------------
I can improve it if need be.
Regards,
Jim
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home