Re: [Xen-devel] Re: upstream merge status for 2.6.38?

To:	Josip Rodin <joy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] Re: upstream merge status for 2.6.38?
From:	Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 13 Jan 2011 03:39:46 -0800 (PST)
Cc:	"xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Thu, 13 Jan 2011 03:40:22 -0800
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1294918786; bh=C9U4TG1H+MVJVJyOVARpD0YFhS2krpKaDmAT2byX1BU=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=3V2Muzb34b8O8C0sJ8q1rrsf6s2k0D4QfJAwt6+wQD1+6wES0Cfgycg3x0Mip42042dMBvf6v7KbkpdgiRdt3rE4lFG5LJGSWdlcoPqwBQmTStLsIqFdo6+ChMyKkLO8mM/K2AZ8Ppf+d4U9+y2wfJJ5TSzCm8OtM4YIsMpPRkw=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Kop3bYsIAv0xAngH3QQKHy3kuoCYMy26oQzddneBdT4NeeffzRBgVZ0A2gtxKbvq9/CD5tAOvZuXZDsr7hzOPG7NI//+lpJOB5qTEjzL5uejXCZwUnVWJQWhqsuDPrwkd7IWsLHVENLCJBkMXFF6oG9Bjljes0kxPjK7dJk18po=;
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1101131050020.7277@kaball-desktop>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> Jeremy is on vacation this time, so don't expect too many things to go
> in during this merge window...

It sounds like Dom0 backend drivers won't come in .38 merge window.
Hence, 2.6.38 will be as much Xen Dom0 functional as 2.6.37 does.
If i am wrong about that, please, advise.

Boris.

--- On Thu, 1/13/11, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: upstream merge status for 2.6.38?
To: "Josip Rodin" <joy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, January 13, 2011, 5:50 AM

On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 09:26:22PM +0100, joy wrote:
> > I see a round of bug fixes and well as xenbus were pulled upstream.
> > Is anything else going into .38?
>
> Later I noticed konrad/xen.git's recently updated:
> * stable/platform-pci-fixes
> * stable/bug-fixes-rc1
> * stable/gntdev
>
> Also very close is stable/irq.rework, still based upon .37-rc5.
>
> Is that all going in?
>

Jeremy is on vacation this time, so don't expect too many things to go
in during this merge window...

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: upstream merge status for 2.6.38?