 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] request of suggestions for mini-OS debugger
| To: | "xen-devel" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] request of suggestions for mini-OS debugger |
| From: | "kim.jin" <kim.jin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 13 Jan 2011 19:04:57 +0800 |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 13 Jan 2011 03:05:40 -0800 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Hi all, Do you think the mini-OS need debugger? I will try to implement it. I have two methods, first follow KDB, and the other follow KGDB. What's your opinions? And can you please give some suggestions? Waiting for your good ideas! -------------- Best Regards! Kim King 2011-01-13 _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Re: upstream merge status for 2.6.38?, Stefano Stabellini |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] xl and GFX passthrough, Sergey Tovpeko |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 4953: regressions - FAIL, xen . org |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] request of suggestions for mini-OS debugger, Samuel Thibault |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
