|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] support of NUMA topology in xl
On 17/12/2010 17:46, "Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Juergen Gross writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] support of NUMA topology
> in xl"):
>> any reason you didn't apply my series up to now?
>> Did I miss any objection?
>
> No, there is no problem with your series. However, our tests are
> failing a lot and I wanted to wait until we have a test pass and a
> push before dumping a lot more stuff into xen-unstable.
>
> So I'm holding off on your series as well as a few others.
>
> Keir, it would be nice if we could try to restrict stuff going into
> xen-unstable to obvious bugfixes, for a bit.
>
> I suggest that our rule for the end-of-December freeze should be that
> patches which were posted in their final form or something very like
> it by (say) Christmas Eve should go into 4.1, even if we have held off
> actually committing them until early January.
>
> Alternatively I can throw everything in now and try to fix it up later
> but it does make it harder to pin down what went wrong when things
> break.
That sounds okay. I have nothing in my queue to be applied now anyway.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|