WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxc: NetBSD: implement xc_evtchn_bind_unbound_

To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxc: NetBSD: implement xc_evtchn_bind_unbound_port
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:43:22 +0000
Cc: Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Christoph
Delivery-date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 08:43:58 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <9c0c5aa7b9fec2740fe3.1291293432@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <9c0c5aa7b9fec2740fe3.1291293432@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, Ian Campbell wrote:
> # HG changeset patch
> # User Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> # Date 1291293181 0
> # Node ID 9c0c5aa7b9fec2740fe3647d89d2a1437ffeddd8
> # Parent  55acbaeab0badc9cded7c1b56af79e45d0f78929
> libxc: NetBSD: implement xc_evtchn_bind_unbound_port.
> 
> Doesn't actually appear to be used anywhere but is defined for other
> OSes.
> 
> The NetBSD evtchn.h contains comments "Return allocated port" for
> several ioctls which currently return the allocated port as a member
> of the argument structure and not as the ioctl return value (I think
> this is a cut and paste error).
> 
> I have assumed that this ioctl follows the same pattern as the
> existing NetBSD ioctls and removed the misleading comments.
> 
> Not even compile tested.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 

applied, thanks


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>