RE: [Xen-devel] reserved words in tmem.h

[Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I certainly don't object and the name Keir chose is fine but,
since this is currently a guest-kernel-only interface definition,
I'd be VERY interested to hear who might be using it in C++.
Is there a guest OS written in C++?  Or is someone trying to
use tmem from user-land?  Or...??

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 4:18 AM
> To: James Harper; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] reserved words in tmem.h
> 
> I fixed this in xen-unstable and I will backport to xen-4.0.
> 
>  -- Keir
> 
> 
> On 10/12/2010 00:33, "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
> > xen/include/public/tmem.h uses 'new' as the name of a structure,
> which
> > is a reserved word under C++. tmem.h is included by xenctrl.h, which
> > prevents anyone writing a C++ userspace app using gntdev and friends
> > without rolling their own modifications to include files.
> >
> > new is a reserved word under C++ but not C (C99 at least), but I
> still
> > think it's bad form to use it in an include file that could
> legitimately
> > be used by a C++ application.
> >
> > Does anyone else see this as a problem?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > James
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xen-devel mailing list
> > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel