WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] iommu=0 leading to panic when system defaults to using x

To: "Keir Fraser" <keir@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] iommu=0 leading to panic when system defaults to using x2apic
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 12:02:30 +0000
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 04:03:17 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C927C3C4.C5DD%keir@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4D0215E0020000780002734A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C927C3C4.C5DD%keir@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> On 10.12.10 at 12:47, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10/12/2010 10:58, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>>>>> On 10.12.10 at 11:06, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Are you looking at xen-4.0? I think you should look at latest xen-unstable
>> 
>> I looked at 4.0 in parallel with -unstable (non-staging) as of
>> yesterday.
> 
> Even before yesterday, xen-unstable benefits from c/s 22388, which is
> intended to work around the iommu=0/x2apic=0 dependency a bit. Not sure if
> it is fully satisfactory. And it is not backported to 4.0 as yet because,
> well, I don't understand this crap enough, basically.

Ah, yes, that makes it better (and I must then have looked at an
older snapshot of -unstable instead).

Still, as you say, a lot of questions remain. On top of what you and
I raised already, I wonder whether the APIC-ID-exceeding-8-bits
case is really being handled correctly now when iommu=0.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel