WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: common time reference between domU and dom0

To: James Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: common time reference between domU and dom0
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:22:58 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 02:23:34 -0800
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qThwHOn6+C69x/9mjvVowAEmEuNyfJNERujaTbXzEVI=; b=xTipB1lrVLGiXWpV4uksMXDtQinf7FkruHdVzBSUroqvaeWFUzbZPeLW3AEi3aRn1w 6iBjipwVPH+rmO8/0PY/7UfSSTBmd62Ms+J0D7LvnjgGcrO3/iNflNd6rHkyLXx5jy83 pGiaOt2xAXjNUbnBSxam7xhz95Ak8LX1ROoEY=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=jVRitlIp7BWijKV68d0qoneOdiRML0YaB0KNBy+LegAgWk8WeCJGBkfnDgi/+wMVo5 oqe4ILfzT7lbiA0gaiqlVaSVR3HmW/raCDCuslsG2tSqB8a3azv/IAzDyTeGgwiDR26l i/3u80a3w9TNCY4Y2S5Yn8eZaSxkrennAteUo=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01BB8980@trantor>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01BB897F@trantor> <C927AAC6.C5A0%keir@xxxxxxx> <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01BB8980@trantor>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101103 Fedora/1.0-0.33.b2pre.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Mnenhy/0.8.3 Thunderbird/3.1.6
On 12/10/2010 11:20 AM, James Harper wrote:
Is that a new call? I don't see it mentioned in 4.0-testing anywhere.

Is there a fallback if HVMOP_get_time doesn't exist?

Not really, but it is really an easy backport to your hypervisor. It will even be in RHEL5.6/CentOS 5.6.

Paolo

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel