|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 13/13] Nested Virtualization: hap-on-hap
 
At 17:49 +0000 on 02 Dec (1291312156), Christoph Egger wrote:
> > My comments on why p2m_flush_locked() isn't enough to reclaim an in-use
> > p2m for recycling still stand.
> 
> Can you point me to the mail in the ML archive you refer to, please?
It's the discussion at the end of this email:
http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-09/msg00624.html
Cheers,
Tim.
-- 
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Principal Software Engineer, Xen Platform Team
Citrix Systems UK Ltd.  (Company #02937203, SL9 0BG)
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |