 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] skb_checksum_setup() placement in pv-ops vs. legacy kernel
| To: | "Ian Campbell" <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] skb_checksum_setup() placement in pv-ops vs. legacy kernel |
| From: | "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 03 Dec 2010 10:52:29 +0000 |
| Cc: | "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Fri, 03 Dec 2010 03:02:34 -0800 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Ian, Jeremy, knowing pretty little about networking, it nevertheless seems to me that the different placement of skb_checksum_setup() (in the receive paths of pv-ops vs in various transmit paths in legacy) poses a compatibility problem (nothing done on either side if sending from pv-ops to legacy, and done on both ends when sending from legacy to pv-ops). Am I overlooking something here? Thanks, Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
