|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [xen-unstable bisection] complete test-amd64-amd64-pv
Ian Jackson writes ("[xen-unstable bisection] complete test-amd64-amd64-pv"):
> *** Found and reproduced problem changeset ***
...
> x86: fixes after emuirq changes
This is a lie too I'm afraid. The allegation is that it leaked a
process, but the process it leaked was
root 26506 1 0 08:36 ttyS0 00:00:00 /sbin/getty -L ttyS0 115200
vt102
I will arrange for gettys to be ignored. I'll think about having the
bisector do a few more before/after runs to decrease the probability
that spurious failures will be pinned on specific changesets.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- [Xen-devel] Re: [xen-unstable bisection] complete test-amd64-amd64-pv,
Ian Jackson <=
|
|
|
|
|