WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86-64: one more adjustment for Fam10 MMCONF ena

To: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86-64: one more adjustment for Fam10 MMCONF enabling
From: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:49:47 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 00:50:48 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4CECDB4B0200007800023FAB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Eikelenboom IT services
References: <4CE56892020000780002312F@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <106904586.20101123223712@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4CECDB4B0200007800023FAB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks for the info !, it's quite unfortunate most things eventually end at the 
bios.

--
Sander

Wednesday, November 24, 2010, 9:30:51 AM, you wrote:

>>>> On 23.11.10 at 22:37, Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Is there anything i have to configure for the "Fam10 MMCONF" to be enabled ?
>> From what i see from my "xm dmesg" it's not enabled, although it's a family 
>> 10h cpu (phenom x6)
>> 
>> (XEN) ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 dfl dfl)
>> (XEN) ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 low level)
>> (XEN) ACPI: IRQ0 used by override.
>> (XEN) ACPI: IRQ2 used by override.
>> (XEN) ACPI: IRQ9 used by override.
>> (XEN) Enabling APIC mode:  Flat.  Using 2 I/O APICs
>> (XEN) ACPI: HPET id: 0x8300 base: 0xfed00000
>> (XEN) PCI: MCFG configuration 0: base e0000000 segment 0 buses 0 - 255
>> (XEN) PCI: Not using MMCONFIG.

> Your BIOS apparently sets up MCFG (including a valid ACPI table)
> but fails to reserve the range in the E820 table, which is taken as
> a strong indication to not use it. For Linux, it's being debated
> whether the command line override ("mmcfg=amd-fam10" in the
> Xen case) should force a reserved region into the E820 table (so
> that the later check succeeds). I'm intending to submit a
> corresponding Xen patch if on the Linux side the decision is
> taken to do so (albeit I'm not fully convinced that this is the
> right thing to do, I agree to the point being made that this
> would normally only be done when the command line option
> was explicitly given - the exception being a DMI white listed set
> of systems).

> There's no other workaround I know of, since Xen (other than
> Linux) doesn't have a mechanism to force an E820 reserved
> region from the command line.

> Jan




-- 
Best regards,
 Sander                            mailto:linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>