WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] RE: "xm create" take more time to return.

To: "Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] RE: "xm create" take more time to return.
From: "Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:14:20 +0800
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:15:29 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <749B9D3DBF0F054390025D9EAFF47F22301CB45C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <749B9D3DBF0F054390025D9EAFF47F22301CB45C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcuHi7XxdCYv8aObQFiDMCs/J2I4dAD+cQpw
Thread-topic: "xm create" take more time to return.
No one care about the stress case? Or this issue only happen to me?

best regards
yang


> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Zhang, Yang Z
> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 9:47 AM
> To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Keir Fraser
> Subject: [Xen-devel] "xm create" take more time to return.
> 
> Hi all
> Now I am running stress test against xen-unstable. We have one case that
> repeated to create/destroy guest one thousand times. I can see it is always
> successful to create/destroy guest at begin of the testing(about first three
> hundreds). But after create/destroy guest about three hundreds, we start to
> see the testing will fail sometime. And at ending of the testing, it always 
> fail to
> create guest.
> After investigation, we found after many times create/destroy guest. The
> return from "xm create guest.config" was very slowly. It may take more than 1
> minutes to return. But guest still successful to create when it returned. With
> "top", I found the xenstored take about 70% cpu utilization when run "xm
> create". So I think there would be something wrong with xenstored after
> create/destroy guest many many times.
> Anyone have suggestion?
> 
> best regards
> yang
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel