WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 		  
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Xen-devel] is a pure usermode backend possible?

from [Stefano Stabellini] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] is a pure usermode backend possible?
From: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:50:48 +0000
Cc: James Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano
Delivery-date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 03:51:56 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C90BFCB5.A88A%keir@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C90BFCB5.A88A%keir@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) 
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010, Keir Fraser wrote:
> Stefano posted a pure userspace blkback for qemu only yesterday. Apparently
> it performs very well.

I am waiting for upstream qemu to work with xen before doing any
benchmarks, because upstream qemu has a far better aio implementation
than the current qemu-xen.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-API] [PATCH 2 of 4] xc: split xc non-upstream bindings into xcext module, Vincent Hanquez
Next by Date:  Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/13] Nested Virtualization: core, Christoph Egger
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Xen-devel] is a pure usermode backend possible?, Keir Fraser
Next by Thread:  RE: [Xen-devel] is a pure usermode backend possible?, James Harper
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]
 
   

Copyright , Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy