|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00/20] x86: ticket lock rewrite and	paravirtualiz
 
| 
To:  | 
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Subject:  | 
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00/20] x86: ticket lock rewrite and	paravirtualization | 
 
| 
From:  | 
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Date:  | 
Mon, 15 Nov 2010 22:08:32 +0100 | 
 
| 
Cc:  | 
Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxx>, Srivatsa,	Linux, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Virtualization <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Vaddagiri <vatsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>,	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Avi | 
 
| 
Delivery-date:  | 
Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:11:22 -0800 | 
 
| 
Envelope-to:  | 
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
In-reply-to:  | 
<4CE19FD1.2000804@xxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
List-help:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> | 
 
| 
List-id:  | 
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-post:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-subscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> | 
 
| 
List-unsubscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> | 
 
| 
References:  | 
<cover.1288794124.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>	<4CDDBBD3.5050903@xxxxxxxxx> <4CDDBCE4.80906@xxxxxxxx>	<4CDDBDB5.8000800@xxxxxxxxx> <4CE1915F.60507@xxxxxxxx>	<4CE1920F.5000509@xxxxxxxxx> <1289852088.2109.553.camel@laptop>	<4CE19FD1.2000804@xxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Sender:  | 
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
 
 
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 13:02 -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> 
> As a heuristic, it shouldn't be too bad performancewise, since
> (handwaving) if ticketholder N has entered the slowpath, then its likely
> that N+1 will as well. 
Yes, esp. if the whole slow unlock path takes more cycles than you spin
for to begin with.
I think this approach is definitely worth trying.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread> |  
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 02/20] x86/ticketlock: convert spin loop to C, (continued)
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |